From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- fs/proc/root.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/proc/root.c') diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c index 13ef6247e7a..fc1609321a7 100644 --- a/fs/proc/root.c +++ b/fs/proc/root.c @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static struct dentry *proc_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, ns = (struct pid_namespace *)data; options = NULL; } else { - ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns; + ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); options = data; } -- cgit v1.2.3