From 60aa49243d09afc873f082567d2e3c16634ced84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:52:56 -0700 Subject: Rationalize fasync return values Most fasync implementations do something like: return fasync_helper(...); But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used in at least one place. Thus, a number of other drivers do: err = fasync_helper(...); if (err < 0) return err; return 0; In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called. Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- fs/ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ioctl.c') diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c index e8e89edba57..ac2d47e4392 100644 --- a/fs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/ioctl.c @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int ioctl_fioasync(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, else error = -ENOTTY; } - return error; + return error < 0 ? error : 0; } static int ioctl_fsfreeze(struct file *filp) -- cgit v1.2.3