From 5ac49ccf61b100c1ee519ba5887ade7179269618 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vadim Yanitskiy Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:57:31 +0700 Subject: MSC_Tests.ttcn: introduce TC_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr The idea of this test case is to verify SM-RP-MR assignment for a few concurrent MO/MT SMS being sent over GSUP. Basically, the algorythm is the following: 1.0 establish a RAN connection, 1.1 send CM Service Request for MO SMMA indication, 1.2 submit MO SMMA indication on DTAP, 1.3 expect MO-ForwardSM-Req on GSUP, 2.0 send MT SMS using MT-ForwardSM-Req on GSUP, 2.1 expect CP-DATA/RP-DATA for MT SMS on DTAP, 3.0 compare both SM-RP-MR values (for MT, assigned by the MSC), 3.1 send MO-ForwardSM-Res for MO SMMA on GSUP, 3.1.1 expect CP-DATA/RP-ACK for MO SMMA on DTAP, 3.2 send CP-DATA/RP-ACK for MT SMS on DTAP, 3.2.1 expect MT-ForwardSM-Res for MT SMS on GSUP. Change-Id: I17cbbaa64d9bce770f985588e93cd3eecd732120 --- msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ msc/expected-results.xml | 1 + 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+) diff --git a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn index fb0798ce..8d29e7a7 100644 --- a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn +++ b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn @@ -2521,6 +2521,110 @@ testcase TC_gsup_mt_sms_rp_mr() runs on MTC_CT { f_vty_config(MSCVTY, "msc", "no sms-over-gsup"); } +/* Test SM-RP-MR assignment for MT-SMS over GSUP */ +private function f_tc_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr(charstring id, BSC_ConnHdlrPars pars) +runs on BSC_ConnHdlr { + var SmsParameters spars_mo := valueof(t_SmsPars); /* MO SMMA */ + var SmsParameters spars_mt := valueof(t_SmsPars); /* MT SMS */ + + f_init_handler(pars); + + /* We need to inspect GSUP activity */ + f_create_gsup_expect(hex2str(g_pars.imsi)); + + /* Perform location update */ + f_perform_lu(); + + /* Register an 'expect' for given IMSI (+TMSI) */ + if (isvalue(g_pars.tmsi)) { + f_bssmap_register_imsi(g_pars.imsi, g_pars.tmsi); + } else { + f_bssmap_register_imsi(g_pars.imsi, 'FFFFFFFF'O); + } + + /* Send CM Service Request for MO SMMA */ + f_establish_fully(EST_TYPE_MO_SMS); + + /* Submit MO SMMA on DTAP */ + log("Submit MO SMMA on DTAP, SM-RP-MR is '00'O"); + spars_mo.rp.msg_ref := '00'O; + f_mo_smma(spars_mo); + + /* Expect MO-forwardSM-Req for MO SMMA on GSUP */ + alt { + [] GSUP.receive(tr_GSUP_MO_READY_FOR_SM_REQ( + imsi := g_pars.imsi, + sm_rp_mr := spars_mo.rp.msg_ref, + sm_alert_rsn := GSUP_SM_ALERT_RSN_TYPE_MEM_AVAIL + )) { + log("RX MO-ReadyForSM-Req, SM-RP-MR is '00'O"); + setverdict(pass); + } + [] GSUP.receive { + log("RX unexpected GSUP message"); + setverdict(fail); + mtc.stop; + } + } + + /* Submit MT SMS on GSUP */ + log("TX MT-forwardSM-Req for the MT SMS"); + f_gsup_forwardSM_req(spars_mt); + + /* Wait for MT SMS on DTAP */ + f_mt_sms_expect(spars_mt); + log("RX MT SMS on DTAP, DTAP TID is ", spars_mt.tid, + ", SM-RP-MR is ", spars_mt.rp.msg_ref); + + /* Both SM-RP-MR values shall be different */ + if (spars_mo.rp.msg_ref == spars_mt.rp.msg_ref) { + log("Both SM-RP-MR values shall be different"); + setverdict(fail); + } + + /* SM-RP-MR value for MT SMS shall be assigned */ + if (spars_mt.rp.msg_ref == 'FF'O) { + log("Unassigned SM-RP-MR value for the MT SMS"); + setverdict(fail); + } + + /* Trigger RP-ACK for MO SMMA by sending MO-forwardSM-Res */ + GSUP.send(valueof(ts_GSUP_MO_READY_FOR_SM_RES( + imsi := g_pars.imsi, + sm_rp_mr := spars_mo.rp.msg_ref))); + /* Expect RP-ACK for MO SMMA on DTAP */ + f_mo_sms_wait_rp_ack(spars_mo); + + /* Send RP-ACK for MT SMS and expect MT-forwardSM-Res on GSUP */ + f_mt_sms_send_rp_ack(spars_mt); + alt { + [] GSUP.receive(tr_GSUP_MT_FORWARD_SM_RES( + imsi := g_pars.imsi, + sm_rp_mr := spars_mt.rp.msg_ref + )) { + log("RX MT-forwardSM-Res (RP-ACK)"); + setverdict(pass); + } + [] GSUP.receive { + log("RX unexpected GSUP message"); + setverdict(fail); + mtc.stop; + } + } + + f_expect_clear(); +} +testcase TC_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr() runs on MTC_CT { + var BSC_ConnHdlrPars pars; + var BSC_ConnHdlr vc_conn; + f_init(); + pars := f_init_pars(93); + f_vty_config(MSCVTY, "msc", "sms-over-gsup"); + vc_conn := f_start_handler_with_pars(refers(f_tc_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr), pars); + vc_conn.done; + f_vty_config(MSCVTY, "msc", "no sms-over-gsup"); +} + /* Test multi-part MT-SMS over GSUP */ private function f_tc_gsup_mt_multi_part_sms(charstring id, BSC_ConnHdlrPars pars) runs on BSC_ConnHdlr { @@ -4457,6 +4561,7 @@ control { execute( TC_gsup_mt_sms_ack() ); execute( TC_gsup_mt_sms_err() ); execute( TC_gsup_mt_sms_rp_mr() ); + execute( TC_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr() ); execute( TC_gsup_mt_multi_part_sms() ); execute( TC_lu_and_mo_ussd_single_request() ); diff --git a/msc/expected-results.xml b/msc/expected-results.xml index 84df2643..efe72199 100644 --- a/msc/expected-results.xml +++ b/msc/expected-results.xml @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ + Tguard timeout MSC_Tests.ttcn:MASKED MSC_Tests control part -- cgit v1.2.3